Armstrong, Neil and Byrom, Nicola (2024) 'An anthropological critique of psychiatric rating scales.' BJPsych Advances. pp. 1-9. (Forthcoming)
|
Text
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY 4.0). Download (192kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This article discusses sceptical arguments about measurement scales. Measurement scales are part of a promising agenda of openness, transparency and patient and public involvement (PPI) in medical research, but have received critical, sometimes hostile attention from anthropologists. This is because scales repackage localised cultural assumptions about distress as something universal and pan-human and have the capacity to reshape people's interior lives in unhelpful, possibly harmful ways. We take as an example the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Use of the PHQ-9 is currently mandated by major funders. But its history suggests flawed PPI and a lack of openness. The article suggests a constructive role for anthropology in mental health research, using ethnographic evidence and theory to show how, although they have their uses, mental health scales should not be regarded as inert or harmless.
| Item Type: | Journal Article |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | Anthropology; rating scales; depressive disorders; history of psychiatry; patients and service users |
| SOAS Departments & Centres: | Departments and Subunits > Department of Anthropology & Sociology |
| ISSN: | 20564678 |
| DOI (Digital Object Identifier): | https://doi.org/10.1192/bja.2024.60 |
| Date Deposited: | 13 Nov 2024 08:42 |
| URI: | https://eprints.soas.ac.uk/id/eprint/42946 |
Altmetric Data
Statistics
Accesses by country - last 12 months | Accesses by referrer - last 12 months |
Repository staff only
 |
Edit Item |