SOAS Research Online

Abstract

Deciding whether or not the colonial state was interested in supporting economic development depends upon the interpretation of a vast and often internally contradictory range of correspondence and government decisions in numerous offices, the field of activity under scrutiny, and the period under examination. Mining and railways, the focus here, were kindred enterprises in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Both were dependent on heavy machinery, the same kinds of energy resources, and, in different ways, a cooperative State. Railways were generally more certain bets for investment, while mining was more regularly the problem child of the colonial world.The present paper examines the relationship between the colonial state and railway construction and mining in colonial Burma and Ghana from the mid-1890s, in the context of the building of the coast-Kumasi route and the Mandalay-Lashio railway and the latter’s connection with the Burma mining railway. It was during the construction of these particular lines that tensions over routes regarding their comparative merits relative to economic development or military and political security occurred. The activities of the railway engineers and mining entrepreneurs examined here indicate the unplanned nature of railway expansion and other aspects of economic development. But these two case studies also suggest some of the dangers of emphasizing too much a singular imperial world over local nuances in seeking to understand colonial history.