SOAS Research Online

A Free Database of the Latest Research by SOAS Academics and PhD Students

[skip to content]

Flügel, Peter (2010) 'Truthfulness and Truth in Jaina Philosophy.' Anusandhān, 50 (2). pp. 166-218.

Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (164kB) | Preview


Truthfulness and truth are not clearly distinguished in Jaina scriptures. A maxim of speaking the truth is stated in the so-called “satya-mahāvrata”, which Jain ascetics recite twice a day during their obligatory pratikramaṇa ritual. In accordance with the preferred Jain method of negative determination, the general principle of truthful speech is treated in terms of its characteristic violations, aticāra, that is, as the opposite of speaking non-truth, a-satya. Normative principles such as this are constitutive for Jain discourse to the extent that they are used by speech communities, both to generate and to interpret speech. The precise implications of the maxim of truthfulness for language usage are specified in form of a distinction of four types or ‘species’ of speech, bhāsā-jāya <bhāṣā-jāta>, which are at the centre of the Jain theory of discourse, supplemented by context-sensitive rules for proper ways of speaking, and examples. These analytical categories should be known and utilised by mendicants (ideally by all Jains) to prevent both the preparation and performance of violence, ārambha. They are investigated in this article from the perspective of comparative philosophy.

Item Type: Journal Article
Additional Information: This article is a slightly amended extract of a chapter of my essay ‘Power and Insight in Jaina Discourse’, published in Logic and Belief in Indian Philosophy, ed. Piotr BALCEROWICZ, 85-217. Warsaw: Oriental Institute (Warsaw Indological Studies, Vol. 3) / Delhi: Motilal Banarsidas, 2010. It is republished here, with permission of the editor, as an offering in memory of Muni Jambūvijayajī.
Keywords: Jaina discourse ethics, modes of speech, bhāsā-jāya <bhāṣā-jāta>, tetra-lemma (catuṣ-koṭi), conversational implicature, Grice, Habermas
SOAS Departments & Centres: Departments and Subunits > School of History, Religions & Philosophies > Department of Religions & Philosophies
Legacy Departments > Faculty of Arts and Humanities > Department of the Study of Religions > Centre of Jaina Studies
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BC Logic
Copyright Statement: With permission of the editor.
Date Deposited: 07 Apr 2010 09:11

Altmetric Data

There is no Altmetric data currently associated with this item.


Download activity - last 12 monthsShow export options
Downloads since deposit
6 month trend
6 month trend
Accesses by country - last 12 monthsShow export options
Accesses by referrer - last 12 monthsShow export options

Repository staff only

Edit Item Edit Item