Bruce-Jones, Eddie (2009) 'Anthropology as Critical Legal Intervention? Instrumentalization, Co-Construction and Critical Reformulation in the Relationship between Anthropology and International Law.' UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs, 14 (2). pp. 331-366.
Abstract
This article creates a coherent way to imagine the relationship between law and anthropology. It describes an analytical separation between three overlapping and interacting branches, aiming to present the relationship in a way that is instructive and programmatic. This article first highlights relevant methods and epistemologies of law and anthropology. Then it explores three central branches of anthropological-legal interaction, framed respectively as instrumentalization, co-construction, and critical reformulation. Ultimately, the article posits that the tensions between anthropology and law, including the (mis)appropriation of anthropology by law, can be theorized and repositioned as a means of more critically understanding how power and culturally-informed perspectives coordinate the production of legal knowledge.
Item Type: | Journal Article |
---|---|
Keywords: | International Law; Refugee Law; Legal Anthropology |
SOAS Departments & Centres: | Departments and Subunits > School of Law |
Subjects: | G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GN Anthropology K Law > KZ Law of Nations G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation J Political Science K Law |
ISSN: | 10892605 |
Date Deposited: | 16 Apr 2023 12:43 |
URI: | https://eprints.soas.ac.uk/id/eprint/39332 |
Related URLs: |
https://www.jst ... stable/45302345
(Publisher URL)
|
Altmetric Data
There is no Altmetric data currently associated with this item.Statistics
Accesses by country - last 12 months | Accesses by referrer - last 12 months |