SOAS Research Online

A Free Database of the Latest Research by SOAS Academics and PhD Students

[skip to content]

Campbell, John (2020) 'Examining Procedural Unfairness and Credibility Findings in the UK Asylum System.' Refugee Survey Quarterly, 39 (1). pp. 56-75.

[img]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
Download (357kB) | Preview

Abstract

This article addresses a key problem confronted by immigration judges (IJs) in their assessment of the asylum claims of unaccompanied asylum-seeking children – who are often not allowed to speak or participate in their own hearings – namely the manner in which asylum legal procedure is intertwined with an IJ’s decision to refuse the claim on the basis of adverse credibility. This article has three linked aims: to examine research that looks at how IJs decide credibility; to set out an ethnographic approach to better understand IJs’ decision-making; and to argue that asylum tribunals need to adopt appropriate guidelines.

Item Type: Journal Article
SOAS Departments & Centres: Departments and Subunits > Department of Anthropology & Sociology
ISSN: 10204067
Copyright Statement: © 2020 Oxford University Press. This article has been accepted for publication in Refugee Survey Quarterly. Published by Oxford University Press.
DOI (Digital Object Identifier): https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdz017
Date Deposited: 17 Sep 2019 10:26
URI: https://eprints.soas.ac.uk/id/eprint/31597

Altmetric Data

Statistics

Download activity - last 12 monthsShow export options
Downloads since deposit
6 month trend
24Downloads
6 month trend
156Hits
Accesses by country - last 12 monthsShow export options
Accesses by referrer - last 12 monthsShow export options

Repository staff only

Edit Item Edit Item