SOAS Research Online

A Free Database of the Latest Research by SOAS Academics and PhD Students

[skip to content]

Bajpai, Rochana and Brown, Graham K. (2013) 'From Ideas to Hegemony: Ideational change and Affirmative action policy in Malaysia, 1955-2010.' Journal of Political Ideologies, 18 (3). pp. 257-280.

Full text not available from this repository.


This article proposes a new approach to hegemony, recast as a tool to capture the power of ideas at the systemic level. Hegemony is conceptualized as a condition in which a set of ideas is accepted by political actors with conflicting interests and as the outcome of a process of discursive interaction. Three types of ideational contestation are distinguished—confrontation, configuration and consistency: hegemony emerges as contestation shifts between these forms. This approach is elaborated through an analysis of key affirmative action policy debates in Malaysia between 1955 and 2010. We show that hegemony depends in part upon the content of ideas; that once ideas become hegemonic they are less liable to radical change; and that ideational hegemony constrains not just ‘subaltern’ groups but also powerful actors. In Malaysia we show the establishment of a hegemonic set of ideas effectively ‘locked in’ dominant elites, even as they sought to change affirmative action policy.

Item Type: Journal Article
SOAS Departments & Centres: Departments and Subunits > Department of Politics & International Studies
Legacy Departments > Faculty of Law and Social Sciences > Department of Politics and International Studies
ISSN: 14699613
DOI (Digital Object Identifier):
Date Deposited: 22 Nov 2013 09:57

Altmetric Data


Download activity - last 12 monthsShow export options
Downloads since deposit
6 month trend
6 month trend
Accesses by country - last 12 monthsShow export options
Accesses by referrer - last 12 monthsShow export options

Repository staff only

Edit Item Edit Item