Otomo, Yoriko (2011) 'Law and the Question of the (Non-Human) Animal.' Society and Animals, 19 (4). pp. 383-391.
The turn of the millennium has witnessed an extraordinary paradox—one identified by Jacques Derrida as a simultaneous increase in violence against nonhuman animals and compassion toward them. This article turns to critical legal theory as well as to recent work by continental philosophers on the human/animal distinction in order to make sense of the ways the paradox manifests in law, arguing that so-called animal welfare laws that appear to be politically progressive are, in fact, iterations of the very violence they purport to redress. What legislation designates as “animal“ has neither language nor a recognized image, which not only renders this singular object of law voiceless but also denies that object access to any experience of death, and thus, to life. Through a deconstruction of recently enacted Japanese “animal welfare“ legislation, this article proposes that the inability of the legislator to think the animal as having a relation to death belies a deeper struggle at the heart of law itself, to constitute its subjects through language.
|Keywords:||Animal Law, Law and Semiotics, The Question of the Animal|
|SOAS Departments & Centres:||Faculty of Law and Social Sciences > School of Law|
|Subjects:||K Law > K Law (General)|
|DOI (Digital Object Identifier):||10.1163/156853011X590033|
|Depositing User:||Yoriko Otomo|
|Date Deposited:||21 Feb 2013 11:43|
Item downloaded times since 21 Feb 2013 11:43.