[ skip to content ]

Differential Treatment in Environmental Law: Addressing Critiques and Conceptualizing the Next Steps

Cullet, Philippe (2016) 'Differential Treatment in Environmental Law: Addressing Critiques and Conceptualizing the Next Steps.' Transnational Environmental Law, 5 (2). pp. 305-328.

[img]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
Download (386kB) | Preview

Abstract

Differential treatment in international environmental law is the broader manifestation of the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities (CBDRs). It reflects equity concerns that have underlain most environmental debates on a North-South basis for several decades. Over the past couple of decades, different forms of differentiation have been introduced in environmental law instruments to the point where it has become an essential element of any international environmental agreement. At the same time, differential treatment has been the object of sustained criticism, arguing that it should be temporary, that it fails to target beneficiaries appropriately, and undermines environmental outcomes. This article takes the opposite view and argues that differentiation remains crucial in a world where widespread inequalities remain. Beneficiaries need to be identified on the basis of environmental and social indicators and differentiation should constitute the basis on which environmental measures are adopted. Worsening environmental conditions and an evolving global context call for adding new elements to the existing framework for differentiation. This requires thinking beyond the current structure centered around nation states and conceptualizing differentiation around common heritage equity. It also requires expanding differentiation beyond the field of environmental law, to include all areas of sustainable development law. Further, differential treatment needs to be implemented in a way that benefits the most disadvantaged in every country. These measures are necessary to foster a vibrant international environmental law that addresses the equity needs of all states in years to come.

Item Type: Articles
SOAS Departments & Centres: Faculty of Law and Social Sciences > School of Law > Law, Environment and Development Centre (LEDC)
DOI (Digital Object Identifier): 10.1017/S204710251600025X
Depositing User: Philippe Cullet
Date Deposited: 25 Aug 2016 17:03
URI: http://eprints.soas.ac.uk/id/eprint/22774

Statistics

Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads since deposit
70Downloads
85Hits
Accesses by country - last 12 months
Accesses by referrer - last 12 months

Research Mentions and Reach

Additional statistics for this record are available via IRStats2

Repository staff only

Edit Item Edit Item