[ skip to content ]

Asylum vs sovereignty in the 21st century: How nation-state's breach international law to block access to asylum.

Campbell, John (2015) 'Asylum vs sovereignty in the 21st century: How nation-state's breach international law to block access to asylum.' International Journal of Migration and Border Studies.

[img]
Preview
Text (article to be published in 2017)
Download (414kB) | Preview

Abstract

Asylum was created by the international community in the 20th century to provide legal protection to individuals fleeing persecution by nation states; but the ability to secure asylum has been fundamentally reshaped by sovereign national interests in the 21st century. This paper has two objectives. First it explores the various ways in which nation-states have adopted policies and pursued agendas which prevent asylum seekers from gaining access to countries of asylum, which criminalize many who enter a country of asylum and which frustrate their ability to obtain asylum. When state signatories breach their legal obligations to the Refugee Convention, the UNHCR has the authority to exercise its ‘supervisory role’ to bring states’ back into compliance. I examine two UNHCR interventions in the United Kingdom which have failed. The paper concludes by discussing how and why it is necessary to radically rethink national asylum and migration policies.

Item Type: Articles
SOAS Departments & Centres: Faculty of Arts and Humanities > Department of Anthropology and Sociology
ISSN: 17552427
Depositing User: John Campbell
Date Deposited: 04 Dec 2015 16:19
URI: http://eprints.soas.ac.uk/id/eprint/21493

Statistics

Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads since deposit
279Downloads
266Hits
Accesses by country - last 12 months
Accesses by referrer - last 12 months
Additional statistics for this record are available via IRStats2

Repository staff only

Edit Item Edit Item