Mucciarelli, Federico M. (2006) 'White knights and black knights. Does the search for competitive bids always benefit the shareholders of “target” companies?' European Company Financial Review, 3 (4). pp. 408-425.
Restricted to SOAS staff only
According to the EC Directive on Takeover Bids, defensive measures should be authorised by the general meeting of the target company. The incumbent board can, nonetheless, search for a competing bid, a so-called “white knight”. The rationale underpinning this exception is that competing bids always benefit target’s shareholders. In this paper I will tackle this rationale, arguing that even competing bids could generate a pressure to tender on target’s shareholders and, therefore, in this case should not be considered as a benefit for them.
|Item Type:||Journal Articles|
|Keywords:||Takeover bids; defensive measure; competing bids; white knight defense; EU takeover directive|
|SOAS Departments & Centres:||Faculty of Law and Social Sciences > School of Finance and Management > Centre for Financial and Management Studies (CeFiMS)|
|Subjects:||K Law > K Law (General)|
|DOI (Digital Object Identifier):||10.1515/ECFR.2006.018|
|Depositing User:||Federico Mucciarelli|
|Date Deposited:||01 Oct 2012 08:51|
Accesses by country - last 12 months
Accesses by referrer - last 12 months