Muchlinski, Peter (2010) 'Limited Liability and Multinational Enterprises: A Case for Reform?' Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34 (5). pp. 915-928.
In the context of corporate groups, the legal principles of limited liability and corporate separation can lead to injustice in cases of harmto involuntary creditors by externalising risks that ought to be internalised by the enterprise as the better risk taker. The avoidance of responsibility can be achieved by interposing a separate legal entity between the victims and the ultimate controller of the group, be it a parent company or its controlling shareholders. The resulting lack of legal responsibility could be remedied in a number of ways ranging from adaptations of existing exceptions to the doctrine of limited liability to outright abolition of limited liability.Preference is given to a statutory principle of enterprise liability for the controlling entity. The implications of these doctrines are also discussed in relation to the choice of jurisdiction in which to bring a legal action.
|SOAS Departments & Centres:||Faculty of Law and Social Sciences > School of Law|
|DOI (Digital Object Identifier):||10.1093/cje/beq023|
|Depositing User:||Peter Muchlinski|
|Date Deposited:||21 Mar 2012 09:58|
Item downloaded times since 21 Mar 2012 09:58.